We migrate with our own engine. Intra-tenant with server-side copy (5–10× faster, without sending data over the internet) and cross-tenant with identity mapping and permission replication. In waves, with GO/NO-GO pilots, checkpoint, automatic resume and outcome reports.
A ShareGate / SPMT alternative with server-side copy and our own engine. Ideal for consolidations, tenant mergers, spin-offs and reorganizations.
Reorganizing within your own tenant is not the same as moving content between two different tenants. LS Migrate covers both scenarios and picks the optimal technical strategy for each case.
Consolidate sites, move libraries, restructure toward a TO-BE architecture — without changing tenants.
Mergers and acquisitions, spin-offs, tenant or vendor change — from the source tenant to the destination.
Our own migration engine (.NET 8) integrated into the Studio. These are the capabilities we use on every project.
Server-to-server copy with no download and re-upload. 5–10× faster than ShareGate or SPMT, without transferring data over the internet.
One engine to migrate between different tenants or reorganize within your own, choosing the optimal strategy per task.
Permissions and access replicated with identity mapping in cross-tenant; direct in intra-tenant. Without losing the security model.
Wave-based migration with source→destination mappings per site, library and list. Full control over the scope of each batch.
Automatic pilots before the mass rollout, with AI analysis that recommends moving ahead or fixing before migrating the rest.
If a wave is interrupted, it picks up from the last checkpoint. Pause, resume and cancel jobs on the fly.
Reorganization plans to consolidate and restructure SharePoint within the same tenant, toward the designed TO-BE.
Readiness checks before and validation after (via Graph API or manual) to close each wave with evidence.
Status by task, error log and an executive migration summary — ready for the committee and for audit.
Sites, libraries, permissions and metadata from the source.
Target architecture and source→destination mappings.
Prioritized batches with defined scope and window.
Pilot wave with AI analysis before the rollout.
Monitored migration and outcome reports per wave.
Every migration task is executed and monitored from the Studio: type, source→destination, files migrated, failed, success rate and real-time status.
| Task | Type | Source → Destination | Migrated | Success | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR — Library | Intra | /sites/rrhh-old → /sites/rrhh | 12.480 | 100% | Completed |
| Legal — Site | Cross | tenantA:/legal → tenantB:/legal | 8.230 | 72% | In progress |
| Operations — List | Intra | /sites/ops → /sites/ops-hub | 3.110 | 100% | Completed |
| Marketing — Library | Cross | tenantA:/mkt → tenantB:/mkt | 540 | 18% | Pilot |
At the close of each wave we deliver evidence: what was migrated, what failed and an executive summary. Plus the migration plan and pilot results.
Tell us the scenario (intra or cross-tenant), the approximate volume and the timeline. Reply within 24 business hours.
You can also email us directly at contacto@latinshare.com.